Jorge v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that elevated electrical usage corroborated the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
• holding that elevated electrical usage both corroborated and refreshed the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
• holding that elevated electrical usage corroborated the informant's tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
• holding that elevated electrical usage both corroborated and refreshed the informant’s tip that the defendant was a marijuana grower
• noting that the dissenting opinion “improperly divides and attacks the evidence provided in the affidavit instead of viewing the evidence in its totality”
• noting that the dissenting opinion “improperly divides and attacks the evidence provided in the affidavit instead of viewing the evidence in its totality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).