Jorge L. Bonilla v. Yamaha Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing applicability of FRE 404(b) in civil context
• “This does not mean, however, that Yamaha had the right to question Bonilla about the 1981 and 1987 speeding violations simply in the hope that he would deny them, thus opening up the Ted herring’ for impeachment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).