Jorge Ibanez-Beltran v. Loretta Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating an expert “witness need not possess all of the knowledge in a given field” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• finding reversible error to exclude testimony about validity of field sobriety tests from a scholar who had not given those tests himself
• “Harmless error exists where the appellate court is convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneously admitted evidence could not have contributed to the verdict.”
• an expert witness must only “possess more knowledge than is - 17 - J-S40007-24 otherwise within the ordinary range of training, knowledge, intelligence or experience” to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).