Skip to main content
· 9/11/2002

Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pacific Farms, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 305 F.3d 1228
  • 8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 76
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18737
  • 2002 WL 31018371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a clearance order is an agreement upon which workers can bring breach of contract claims
  • concluding that the FLSA did not require farm owners to reimburse farmworkers for fees charged by recruiters where the allegations failed to support the creation of apparent authority between the farm owners and recruiters
  • explaining that FLSA wages must be paid “free and clear” of improper deductions under 29 C.F.R. § 531.35
  • noting that the employer is required to reimburse an employee only “up to the point that the minimum wage is met”
  • noting that the employer is required to reimburse an employee only “up to the point that the minimum wage is met”
  • explaining that employer cannot require employee to reimburse expenses primarily for employer’s benefit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Dubina, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.