JORDON M. NORTON v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “ ‘well established that certain constitutional protections available to persons inside the United States are unavailable to aliens outside our geographic borders.’ ”
• finding it \`well established that certain constitutional protections available to persons inside the United States are unavailable to aliens outside our geographic borders.'\
• implying Guantanamo detainees do not have First Amendment rights even though \[t]he First Amendment's guarantees of freedom of speech and free exercise of religion do not mention individuals\
• \The text of the lease and decisions of circuit courts and the Supreme Court all make clear that Cuba—not the United States—has sovereignty over Guantanamo Bay.\
• “[T]he dissent offers the distinction that the Suspension Clause is a limitation on congressional power rather than a constitutional right. But this is no distinction at all.”
• “Testimony procured by coercion is notoriously unreliable and unspeakably inhumane.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).