Jordan v. Woodward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing appeal for failing to comply with CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) and (v)
• finding claim waived because “aside from the four rules cited in his statement of points and authorities, Craig utterly fails to provide ‘ample supportive references to the record and citations of authority pertinent to each issue of law’”
• dismissing appeal for failing to comply with CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) and (v)
• dismissing appeal for failing to comply with CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) and (v)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).