Jordan v. Wallace's Adm'r

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs’ conversion claim was preempted by federal patent law, where plaintiffs’ “assertion of ownership over the subject matter of the Woodway Patents, which underlies their claim of conversion, clearly turns on a determination of inventorship”
• explaining that “according to controlling precedent, a state law claim that either seeks ‘patent-like’ protections not provided by federal patent law, or turns on a determination of inventorship, is preempted by federal patent law”
• granting in part and denying in part Woodway’s motion to dismiss Third Amended Complaint
• granting in part and denying in part Woodway’s motion to dismiss Third Amended Complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).