Skip to main content
· 5/15/1831

Jordan v. Sylvester

Citations

  • 7 Me. 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding evidence legally sufficient to support best-interest finding even though patient did not address her religious beliefs
  • explaining the uses of Reglan and the potential adverse consequences from its prolonged prescription
  • explaining the uses of Reglan and the potential adverse consequences from its prolonged prescription

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mellen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.