District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/20/2010
Jordan v. State
Citations
- 36 So. 3d 796
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965
- 2010 WL 1994097
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating order barring appellant from future pro se filings because his second rule 3.800(a) motion contained issues not previously raised and was not successive
- vacating order prohibiting the defendant from filing pro se motions as a sanction for filing repetitive rule 3.800(a) motions because the defendant never raised a claim that was previously adjudicated on the merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Van Nortwick Rowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.