Skip to main content

Jordan v. State

Citations

  • 54 S.W.3d 783
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
  • 2001 WL 717508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a judgment is rarely void and that “[a]n ‘involuntary plea’ does not constitute one of those rare situations”
  • noting that “nothing prevents the trial court from considering the [habeas] application along with the State’s motion to revoke probation”
  • noting that involuntariness claims are cognizable on writ of habeas corpus
  • reaffirming the void judgment exception and noting the A habeas corpus @ exception to the prohibition against attacking the original conviction upon revocation
  • permitting the contemporaneous filing of a 4 writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.08 or 11.09 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
  • permitting the contemporaneous filing of a writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.08 or 11.09 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Meyers, Price, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

226 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.