Skip to main content

Jordan v. Sava, Inc.

Citations

  • 222 S.W.3d 840
  • 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 2881
  • 2007 WL 1119931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an emergency instruction was not error when driver rear-ended stopped or slow-moving vehicle on a blind side of an overpass
  • concluding that an emergency instruction was not error when driver rear-ended stopped or slow-moving vehicle on a blind side of an overpass
  • explaining that two cases interpreting sudden emergency doctrine as lower standard of care misapplied doctrine by intermingling it with doctrine of imminent peril
  • explaining that “if [sudden emergency] doctrine has been pleaded, and there is some evidence of probative value to support its application, the trial court has a duty to instruct the jury to assist it in reaching its verdict”
  • explaining the mere fact of rear-end collision does not establish negligence, which may depend on speed, distance, and control of the vehicle
  • noting an emergency condition may arise from a stopped car, a car slowing down, or an oncoming car in the same lane of traffic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evelyn v. Keyes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.