Oregon Supreme Court· 8/30/2007
Jordan v. SAIF Corp.
Citations
- 343 Or. 208
- 167 P.3d 451
- 2007 Ore. LEXIS 810
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[The] use of a term in one section and not in another section of the same statute indicates a purposeful omission.\
- use of particular term in one section of statute, but not another section of same statute, indicates purposeful omission
- where legislature includes particular procedures in one section of statute, but not another, court presumes that omission is purposeful
- the legislature’s omission of review of suspensions from the list of own-motion authority granted to the Workers’ Compensation Board is “some indication” that the legislature intended to omit suspensions from the board’s own motion authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 18×
- Gadalean v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Gadalean)Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-04-18· cited 9×
- State Ex Rel. Portland Habilitation Center, Inc. v. Portland State UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 2012-12-13· cited 3×
- Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-16· cited 1×
- Hynix Semiconductor v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-12-2011)Oregon Tax Court· 2011-05-12
- Hynix Semicond. Mfg. v. Lane County Assr., Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-5-2011)Oregon Tax Court· 2011-05-05
- 122nd Group, LLC v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-09· cited 23×
- SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BD. v. Emerald PUDOregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-30· cited 16×
- Dougan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 8×
- Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 2×
- In the Matter of JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.