Skip to main content

Jordan v. SAIF Corp.

Citations

  • 343 Or. 208
  • 167 P.3d 451
  • 2007 Ore. LEXIS 810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[The] use of a term in one section and not in another section of the same statute indicates a purposeful omission.\
  • use of particular term in one section of statute, but not another section of same statute, indicates purposeful omission
  • where legislature includes particular procedures in one section of statute, but not another, court presumes that omission is purposeful
  • the legislature’s omission of review of suspensions from the list of own-motion authority granted to the Workers’ Compensation Board is “some indication” that the legislature intended to omit suspensions from the board’s own motion authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.