Jordan v. Raccuglia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that King was “expressly limited” to violent felons and does not apply to individuals on probation for nonviolent drug crimes
• recognizing a district court’s authority to impose daily sanctions to coerce compliance 22 with court order
• recognizing a district court’s authority to impose daily sanctions to coerce compliance 11 with court order
• recognizing a district court’s authority to impose daily sanctions to coerce compliance 19 with court order
• determining the terms container and property in a probationer’s Fourth Amendment waiver did not encompass a cell phone
• “The government did not make this argument in the district court, and consequently it has failed to preserve this argument on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).