Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 9/24/1984

Jordan v. Heckler

Citations

  • 744 F.2d 1397
  • 7 Soc. Serv. Rev. 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding rep payee misuse of funds was not “initial determination” and therefore did not trigger federal hearing, but misuse claims “could however go against the representative as an individual with state law remedies available”
  • holding rep payee misuse of funds was not “initial determination” and therefore did not trigger federal hearing, but misuse claims “could however go against the representative as an individual with state law remedies available”
  • analyzing the substantial benefit exception where the benefited class numbered four million
  • declining to apply the doctrine to the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Seth, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Jordan v. Heckler

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.