Jordan v. Florida Publishing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a legal sufficiency review should \not consider evidence that a factfinder reasonably could have disbelieved.\
• holding that the concept of fundamental error cannot be used to bypass rule 279
• holding that rendition of judgment would generally be required if the evidence 9 was legally insufficient to support a trial court’s termination order
• holding that clear and convincing evidence burden of proof in termination cases alters the appellate standard of legal sufficiency review
• holding that clear and convincing evidence burden of proof in termination cases alters the appellate standard of legal sufficiency review
• holding that Rule of Civil Procedure 279 does not deprive parents of due process in termination appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).