Jordan v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the appeal of Hopson’s co-defendant which also held none of the two men’s actions could be regarded as an act toward the consummation of a robbery because they were diverted from their purpose before they committed any act toward its accomplishment
• “They were diverted from their purpose before they committed any act toward its accomplishment.”
• considering the appeal of Hopson’s co-defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parsons v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-06-13· cited 50×
• Rogers v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-10-06· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Holdaway
  Loudoun County Circuit Court· 1993-06-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-21· cited 959×
• Bell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-01-02· cited 66×
• Sizemore v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-04-21· cited 56×
• Tharrington v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-07-01· cited 36×