Jordan & Nobles Construction Co. v. Orah Wall Financial Corp. (In Re Orah Wall Financial Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even though the evidence showed there might be “minor damage to wall paper” upon removal of the cabinets, “[s]uch [was] not ‘material injury” ”
• holding that removal of exterior doors would not violate the Monocrete Incorporation test because “[i]njury to the structure exists (i.e. exposure to the elements), but removal of any item may result in this problem ... Monocrete would apparently have allowed this type of injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).