Jordan Marsh Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such stipulation generally need not be accompanied by a colloquy on the record between the defendant and the trial court
• stating that Old Chief holds \that a trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to accept a stipulation to a prior conviction upon defense counsel's request\ (emphasis omitted)
• applying Strickland v. 11 No. 50636-0-II Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
• a defendant can stipulate to “crucial facts” and is presumed to consent to stipulations by his lawyer unless he expressly objects
• courts have “applied a presumption” that the failure to request a 15 No. 51540-7-II limiting instruction is a “tactical decision to avoid reemphasizing prejudicial information.”
• no limiting instruction for defendant’s stipulation to a prior offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).