Jordaan v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the doctrine prevents “thinly veiled attempt[s] to circumvent the state appellate process and to collaterally attack – in the guise of a federal civil rights action – the validity of a state court [judgment] and other related orders”
• noting that the doctrine prevents “thinly veiled attempt[s] to circumvent the state appellate process and to collaterally attack — in the guise of a federal civil rights action — the validity of a state court [judgment] and other related orders”
• finding that the plaintiff’s constitutional claims were “nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to 8 circumvent the state appellate process and to collaterally attack—in the guise of a federal civil rights action—the validity of a state court divorce decree and other related orders”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).