Jopling v. Chachere
Citations
- 107 La. 522
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The.confirmation by the old Board of Commissioners for the Western District of the Territory of Orleans, under the Act of Congress of 1807, of a claim to land based upon occupancy and settlement followed by the confirmation by Congress of the claim so confirmed, operated as effectually as a grant or quit claim from the government. The ownership of the confirmee to the land was not held in abeyance until a patent issued. The patent was simply documentary, recognitive, evidence of the existence of the confirmed title. Property so confirmed became, from the date of the confirmation, subject to State taxation.</p> <p>2. The mere failure of a tax collector to make, in his deed, recitals of fact which it would have been, proper for him to have made, does not render the tax sale to which it refers, ipso facto, an absolute nullity, and open as such to a collateral attack, nor does such fact destroy the good faith of tho purchaser in raking possession of and holding the property as owner under it.</p> <p>3. The existence of a defect in a tax sale, resulting from a defect in the assess ment of the property, does not deprive the sale from being made the basis of the prescription of ten years, where defect is a atent one, which the purchaser was not called upon to ascertain or know.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that motion to dismiss challenging three out of four alleged market definitions supporting antitrust claim was not a proper motion to dismiss because it did not seek to dismiss an entire claim
- “As the Second Circuit has long held, ‘part only of a single claim cannot be adjudicated with finality.’”
- “As the Second Circuit has long held, ‘part only of a single claim cannot be adjudicated with finality.’”
- “[A] ‘claim’ is a set of facts that can support liability for the defendant under a cause of action.”
- “[A]t the pleading stage, parties are not entitled to a determination that certain of the alternative legal theories under which the plaintiff might be entitled to relief will not fly.”
- “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4) provides that service of a Rule 12 motion suspends the movant's time to file a responsive pleading until fourteen days after the court issues a decision on the motion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Decree, Monroe, Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.