Jones v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient notice where plaintiffs notice letter “alleged not only widespread violations of the NVRA [but] also gave concrete figures more than sufficient to support [plaintiffs] claim”
• refusing to infer from ambiguous phrases such as “here” and “at an office” that Congress intended to limit paragraph (a)(6) in Section 7 “to in-person transactions conducted at the physical location of the assistance offices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).