Skip to main content

Jones v. White

Citations

  • 717 S.E.2d 322
  • 311 Ga. App. 822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that unjust enrichment requires party conferring labor to act with expectation that the party receiving the benefit is responsible for the cost
  • Amutual promise that a golf course developer would split consulting fees equally among several consultants was specific enough to be definitely and objectively ascertainable so as to form the basis of a contract.
  • An unexecuted written agreement drafted by one party and an e-mail by the other party to his attorney regarding the agreement were writings that corroborated testimony regarding an oral agreement to split consulting fees.
  • jury could infer plaintiff “did compensable consulting work in furtherance of the” project
  • \A claim of unjust enrichment will lie if there is no legal contract and the party sought to be charged has been conferred a benefit by the party contending an unjust enrichment which the benefited party equitably ought to return or compensate for.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Ellington, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.