Jones v. Vance Shoe Co.
Citations
- 115 F. 707
- 53 C.C.A. 289
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4242
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Validity—Vagueness of Terms.</p> <p>A written contract between two stockholders in a- corporation, by which one agreed “to provide as a loan, to the said (corporation) whatever additional capital is needed to provide a working fund,” is too uncertain and vague to be enforceable in a court of law by an action to recover damages for its breach.</p>
Judges: Bunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court· 1981-11-17· cited 23×
- Jones v. JanesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1924-06-28· cited 18×
- Raisler Sprinkler Co. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware· 1934-01-04· cited 15×
- Royal Bank of Canada v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1927-06-03· cited 9×
- Murphy v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1917-05-12· cited 8×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 42×
- Durkee v. People ex rel. AskrenIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 37×
- Marble v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1897-11-24· cited 27×
- Hart v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia· 1897-05-19· cited 18×
- O'Connor v. WhittallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1897-11-24· cited 8×
- Kelly v. FahrneyEighth Circuit· 1899-10-16· cited 7×
- Van Schaick v. Van BurenNew York Supreme Court· 1893-07-08· cited 4×
Other cases named Jones v. Vance Shoe Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.