Jones v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Tex.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying sanctions for a meritless appeal because the appeal did “not appear to have been prosecuted for delay, harassment, or other improper purposes”
• “[T]he court may impose prefiling restrictions on an individual with a history of repetitive or vexatious litigation.”
• “[T]he court may impose prefiling restrictions on an individual with a history of repetitive or vexatious litigation.”
• “[T]he court may impose prefiling restrictions on an individual with a history of repetitive or vexatious litigation.”
• “[T]he court may impose prefiling restrictions on an individual with a history of repetitive or vexatious litigation.”
• “[T]he court may impose prefiling restrictions on an individual with a history of repetitive or vexatious litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).