Skip to main content
· 11/23/1993

Jones v. Trojak

Citations

  • 634 A.2d 201
  • 535 Pa. 95
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that “the law will not permit a person in these situations to challenge the status which he or she has previously accepted”
  • indicating that “the law will not permit a person in these situations to challenge the status which he or she has previously accepted”
  • holding order requiring blood tests to determine paternity is interlocutory but immediately appealable
  • holding order requiring blood tests to determine paternity is interlocutory but immediately appealable
  • holding order requiring blood tests to determine paternity is interlocutory but immediately appealable
  • stating an appellate court in Pennsylvania may “review court ordered blood tests at the interlocutory stage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.