Skip to main content
· 1/15/2010

Jones v. Sussex I State Prison

Citations

  • 591 F.3d 707
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 952
  • 2010 WL 155251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that § 2254 's exhaustion requirement means that a state prisoner must have first presented his claim before every available state court
  • “Because procedural default constitutes an affirmative defense in habeas cases, the burden rests with a state to prove the adequacy of the relied-on procedural bar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael, Motz, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.