· 1/15/2010
Jones v. Sussex I State Prison
Citations
- 591 F.3d 707
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 952
- 2010 WL 155251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that § 2254 's exhaustion requirement means that a state prisoner must have first presented his claim before every available state court
- “Because procedural default constitutes an affirmative defense in habeas cases, the burden rests with a state to prove the adequacy of the relied-on procedural bar.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael, Motz, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.