Skip to main content
· 5/4/2005

Jones v. Sterling

Citations

  • 110 P.3d 1271
  • 210 Ariz. 308
  • 451 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 51
  • 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the trial court’s denial of an appointment of an expert is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
  • providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
  • providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
  • providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
  • “The denial of expert witness assistance to a criminal defendant can violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
  • “[E]vidence seized as a result of a traffic stop meeting normal Fourth Amendment standards is not rendered inadmissible because of the subjective motivations of the police who made the stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.