· 5/4/2005
Jones v. Sterling
Citations
- 110 P.3d 1271
- 210 Ariz. 308
- 451 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 51
- 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the trial court’s denial of an appointment of an expert is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
- providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
- providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
- providing that when we can avoid constitutional doubt by interpreting a statute in a manner that does no violence to its text, we will adopt that interpretation
- “The denial of expert witness assistance to a criminal defendant can violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
- “[E]vidence seized as a result of a traffic stop meeting normal Fourth Amendment standards is not rendered inadmissible because of the subjective motivations of the police who made the stop.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.