Jones v. Stayman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellate rules should be interpreted liberally to allow appellate courts to reach merits of case wherever possible
• holding appellate rules should be interpreted liberally to allow appellate courts to reach merits of case wherever possible
• “Indigency provisions ... have long been liberally construed in favor of a right to appeal.”
• wherein the appellant's attorney sent a letter rather than a copy of the affidavit
• “Indigency provisions, like other appellate rules, have long been liberally construed in favor of a right to appeal.”
• “Indigency provisions . . . have long been liberally construed in favor of a right to appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).