Jones v. State Board of Medicine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “fair and substantial relationship” test to an equal protection challenge to a statute limiting medical malpractice recoveries and remanding for further factual information
• remanding for factual determination on whether a medical malpractice “crisis” actually existed in Idaho to justify adoption of damages limitation
• remanding for factual determination on whether a medical malpractice \crisis\ actually existed in Idaho to justify adoption of damages limitation
• remanding for full development of record as to any real health care industry crisis to which a cap on medical malpractice recoveries may bear a fair and substantial relationship
• remanding for full development of record as to any real health care industry crisis to which a cap on medical malpractice recoveries may bear a fair and substantial relationship
• remanding for full development of record as to any real crisis for the Idaho health care industry to which a cap on medical malpractice recoveries may bear a fair and substantial relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).