Jones v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established . . . that resolving evidentiary conflicts and inconsistencies . . . are the province of the factfinder, not this Court.” (punctuation omitted)
• “It is the function of the jury to judge the credibility of the witnesses, resolve conflicts in the testimony, weigh the evidence, and draw reasonable inferences from the evidence. In so doing, a jury is authorized to believe or disbelieve all or any part of the testimony of witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• GARNER v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-06-19· cited 20×
• Paul Serdula v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-06-18
• David Little v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-09-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Reese v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-08· cited 204×
• Knight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-04· cited 14×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-02-03· cited 12×
• Falay v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-26· cited 7×