Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 885 N.E.2d 1286
  • 2008 Ind. LEXIS 405
  • 2008 WL 2058244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the sanctions imposed for a probation violation are not subject to review for inappropriateness pursuant to Ind. App. R. 7(B)
  • noting that a remedy under Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B) is not available on appeals from a probation revocation hearing
  • “A trial court’s action in a post- sentence probation violation proceeding is not a criminal sentence as contemplated by the rule.”
  • “A trial court’s action in a post-sentence probation violation proceeding is not a criminal sentence as contemplated by [Rule 7(B)].”
  • “[t]he action taken by a trial court in a probation revocation proceeding is not a sentencing.”
  • “A trial court’s action in a post-sentence probation violation proceeding is not a criminal sentence as contemplated by the rule. The review and revise remedy of App. R. 7(B) is not available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.