Supreme Court of Delaware· 5/16/2016
Jones v. State
Citations
- 139 A.3d 843
- 2016 WL 2929109
- 2016 Del. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 61 establishes the procedure for setting aside a conviction or sentence of death only and that any other sentencing issues must be raised in a Rule 35 motion
- “Because the language at issue in Johnson does not appear in Delaware’s habitual offender statute, 11 Del. C. § 4214, this Court has held that the holding of Johnson does not apply under Delaware law.”
- because the troubling language at issue in the federal armed-career-criminal statute did not appear in Delaware’s habitual offender statute the federal courts’ holdings that a provision of the federal statute was unconstitutionally vague did not apply under Delaware law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.