District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/1/2014
Jones v. State
Citations
- 143 So. 3d 1102
- 2014 WL 3756354
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11764
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because Jones’ motion was compliant in all respects save an oath, he was entitled to an opportunity to amend pursuant to rule 3.801(e), which incorporates the provision in rule 3.850(f)(2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Evander, Orfinger, Wallis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.