Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 117 So. 3d 818
  • 2013 WL 3197137
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court could not rely on observations of lay witnesses of events that occurred before law enforcement arrived to determine whether defendant was guilty of loitering and prowling
  • evaluating sufficiency of the evidence to establish a new law violation as a basis to revoke probation under the de novo standard
  • witnesses’ reports could not be used to support loitering or prowling; only officer’s observations could be considered
  • “At the violation hearing, the State abandoned all allegations of violation except for k.4.”
  • “the witnesses’ report of individuals knocking on their door cannot be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerber, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.