Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 876 S.W.2d 262
  • 317 Ark. 131
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]t is within the Trial Court’s discretion to rely on a second evaluation when making the competency determination because the issue of competence pertains directly to the accused’s ability to understand the charges against him and assist in his defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.