Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 838 N.E.2d 1146
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2322
  • 2005 WL 3372618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the defendant to serve a portion of his previously-suspended sentence as a result of probation violations
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the defendant to serve a portion of his previously suspended sentence as a result of probation violations
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Jones to serve thirty years of his previously-suspended sentence after he violated the terms and conditions of his probation
  • no abuse of discretion in ordering defendant to serve thirty years of a previously-suspended sentence; defendant committed a new crime, failed to report to the probation office, and traveled without permission
  • no abuse of discretion in lengthy sentence imposed for second probation violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Baker, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.