Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 571 So. 2d 1374
  • 1990 WL 205309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that certain unobjected-to statements made by a prosecutor, although improper, did not constitute fundamental error
  • “We do not want to encourage the creation of ‘gotchas’ whereby the defense is allowed to sit on its rights, saying nothing until after it sees whether the jury returns an adverse verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nimmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.