Supreme Court of Missouri· 9/13/1971
Jones v. State
Citations
- 471 S.W.2d 166
- 1971 Mo. LEXIS 927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where trial court treated mov-ant’s motion under Rule 27.26 as a petition for habeas and denied relief, but petitioner erroneously filed an appeal rather than a new petition in this Court, Court would treat appeal as if it were a new petition for writ
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Swallow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-05-14· cited 96×
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-07-23· cited 55×
- Wiglesworth v. WyrickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1976-01-12· cited 53×
- McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-09-23· cited 51×
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. KellySupreme Court of Missouri· 2001-10-23· cited 48×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1973-04-11· cited 42×
- State v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1977-08-16· cited 42×
- E. W. v. K. D. M.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1973-02-12· cited 17×
- E. W. v. K. D. M.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1972-03-28· cited 3×
- Nelson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1974-02-26· cited 2×
- Durant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-09-11· cited 2×
- Arington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-07-12· cited 1×
- Timothy S. Willbanks v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-10-27
- Griffin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1974-06-03
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri· 2023-10-03
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.