Jones v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when procedural requirements do not affirmatively appeal* in the record to have been violated, a presumption of regularity of the trial judge’s ruling must prevail
• where procedural requirements do not affirmatively appear in record to have been violated, presumption of regularity prevails

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-15· cited 87×
• Wright v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-02-18· cited 71×
• Postell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-24· cited 50×
• Rojas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1997-03-17· cited 22×
• Gorham v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-02-03· cited 17×
• Moussazadeh v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-02-05· cited 15×
• James v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1983-10-21· cited 9×
• Cano v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-14· cited 8×
• Ex parte Pardun
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-11· cited 2×
• Cesar Benitez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-07-29
• Bailey, William Flann v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-12
• Gary Allan Seals v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-11-16
• Earnest Manley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2011-06-17
• Brett Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2010-07-21
• Jonte Lamar Horton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-10-18
• Raymond Gene Lazarine v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2021-12-02