Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 235 S.W.3d 783
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1387
  • 2007 WL 2937151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where defendant had poured methamphetamine into a bottle of bleach, the bleach could be used to determine the aggregate weight of the methamphetamine 4 Indeed, section 481.002(5
  • holding that, where defendant had poured methamphetamine into bottle of bleach, the bleach could be used to determine aggregate weight of methamphetamine “[r]egardless of when, how, or why it was added”
  • concluding that when defendant’s accomplice poured liquid methamphetamine into bottle of bleach hoping to destroy the drug during police pursuit, bleach was “added to or mixed with” the controlled substance and could be added to aggregate weight
  • explaining that if “the evidence clearly warrants conviction independent of the accomplice testimony, the trial court’s failure to instruct on the law of accomplice testimony is not reversible error”
  • explaining that if “the evidence clearly warrants conviction independent of the accomplice testimony, the trial court’s failure to instruct on the law of accomplice testimony is not reversible error”
  • jury is free to believe or disbelieve a witness in whole or in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.