Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 625 S.E.2d 1
  • 280 Ga. 205
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3758
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where trial counsel testified to the reasoning behind the failure to seek a limiting instruction
  • “[t]he decision of criminal defense counsel not to request limiting instructions is presumed to be strategic”
  • “[t]he decision of criminal defense counsel not to request limiting instructions is presumed to be strategic”
  • non-redacted indictment including irrelevant charges was not prejudicial because “it showed that the [other] initial charges were either reduced or dead docketed”
  • non-redacted indictment including irrelevant charges was not prejudicial because “it showed that the [other] initial charges were either reduced or dead docketed”
  • “[t]he decision of criminal defense counsel not to request limiting instructions is presumed to be strategic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.