Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 515 S.E.2d 841
  • 237 Ga. App. 847
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1636
  • 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a reasonably prudent man would be justified in his belief that his safety was in danger when going to a known drug area
  • a reasonably prudent man would be justified in his belief that his safety was in danger when going to a known drug area
  • officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct field interview of defendant where, among other things, drugs had been found on defendant’s companion
  • possession of a “crack pipe” is possession of a drug related object in contravention of OCGA § 16-13-32.2
  • “The warnings proposed by [Plaintiff’s] experts would have provided the crane operator with no unknown information.”
  • presence of cocaine residue on pipe, while not essential, tends to prove the “intent to use” element under OCGA § 16-13-32.2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Pope, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.