Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 365 S.E.2d 263
  • 258 Ga. 25
  • 1988 Ga. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • authorizing the jury to infer from the evidence that appellant lacked authority to enter the victim’s home even in the absence of direct evidence on that issue
  • authorizing the jury to infer from the evidence that appellant lacked authority to enter the victim’s home even in the absence of direct evidence on that issue
  • rejecting claim that in-court identification was impermissibly tainted by pretrial showup identification, where the witness testified that he observed the defendant for three or four seconds in a well-lit area and gave an accurate, detailed description to officers.
  • in-court identification was reliable where the witness based his identification of the defendant on his observations from the scene of the crime rather than on a police show-up identification
  • “while there is no direct evidence on this issue, there is circumstantial evidence from which the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant lacked the authority to enter the victim’s home”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.