Jones v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presence of consensual encounter is factual question, and trial court's answer to that question should not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Livingston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-11· cited 17×
• State v. Poole
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 17×
• Golphin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-07· cited 16×
• State v. Baldwin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-20· cited 16×
• Brye v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07· cited 16×
• Brooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 15×
• State v. Collins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-27· cited 10×
• State v. Ferrell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-13· cited 5×
• Hilgeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-08· cited 4×
• Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-23· cited 3×
• Copeland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-03· cited 3×
• State v. Luckay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-25· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Florida v. Bostick
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
• McNamara v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-31· cited 207×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-30· cited 43×
• State v. Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-16· cited 18×
• Sholtz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-18· cited 12×
• State v. Daniels
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-13· cited 10×
• State v. Diaz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-03· cited 3×