Jones v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A contract required by the Statute of Frauds to be in writing that is altered after it is signed is not . . . a binding contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ames v. Great Southern Bank
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 164×
• Frost National Bank v. Burge
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-09· cited 133×
• Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegel
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-07-15· cited 55×
• Marker v. Garcia
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-11-02· cited 17×
• Spillman v. Self-Serv Fixture Co., Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-05-16· cited 6×
• Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Robert Schlegel and Myrna Schlegel
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-07-15
• Stacey Scott v. Larry Furrow and Keller Williams Legacy Group
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-10-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Smith v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-17· cited 9×