Skip to main content
· 5/24/1898

Jones v. . Rhea

Citations

  • 30 S.E. 346
  • 122 N.C. 721
  • 1898 N.C. LEXIS 335

Syllabus

<p>Action on Note — Contract—Defence—Partial Failure of Consideration — Parol Evidence of Contemporaneous ’ Agreement.</p> <p>1. Where a contract is not required to be in writing, if the entire contract is not reduced to writing, the omitted part may he proved by parol, (although no fraud or mistake be alleged), not for the purpose of contradicting or explaining the written part, but to enable the jury to ascertain the entire and true agreement of the parties.</p> <p>2. In the trial of an action on a note expressed to have been given for legal services rendered by the payee, the maker may show by parol evidence that the agreement was that the payee should attend to all her business in connection with her administration of an estate, and that a large amount of work remained to be done which he refused to do.</p>

Judges: Faikcloth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.