Jones v. Porretta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We agree with the plaintiff that there are times when the giving of such an instruction may mislead the jury by focusing the jury's attention on an irrelevant issue unsupported by the defendant's theory of the case or the evidence submitted.\
• “We agree with the plaintiff that there are times when the giving of such an instruction may mislead the jury by focusing the jury’s attention on an irrelevant issue unsupported by the defendant’s theory of the case or the evidence submitted.”
• \expert evidence must usually be presented\ in res ipsa cases
• “We agree with the plaintiff 7 that there are times when the giving of such an instruction may mislead the jury by focusing the jury’s attention on an irrelevant issue unsupported by the defendant’s theory of the case or the evidence submitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).