Skip to main content
· 5/21/1985

Jones v. Philip Atkins Construction Co.

Citations

  • 371 N.W.2d 508
  • 143 Mich. App. 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding good cause where the plaintiff’s attorney was dealing with the defendant’s claim office in Michigan but a writ of garnishment was served on the insurance commissioner and then forwarded to offices out-of-state which had no record of the litigation
  • \The completed operations exclusion appears on a separate endorsement. This Court has previously held that endorsements or riders prevail over form provisions of a contract\
  • “The completed operations exclusion appears on a separate endorsement. This Court has previously held that endorsements or riders prevail over form provisions of a contract”
  • \The completed operations exclusion appears on a separate endorsement. This Court has previously held that endorsements or riders prevail over form provisions of a contract\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillis, Kelly, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.