Skip to main content
· 5/17/1989

Jones v. PALMER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED

Citations

  • 440 N.W.2d 884
  • 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2137
  • 1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 153
  • 1989 WL 52272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding expression of opinions is not defamation and is protected by the first amendment
  • noting that substantial truth is an absolute defense in a defamation action
  • the court must consider “the relation of the statements to the duties of the public official”
  • “In determining whether the publication of the statement was excessive, the court must find a ‘valid interest on the part of the general public which necessitated or justified’ the broadcast.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.