Jones v. One Fifty Foot Gulfstar Motor Sailing Yacht, Hull No. 01

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the burden placed on a district court when it must conduct an in camera inspection of documents
• while interrogatories could be used under previous rule to inquire as to basis of expert's opinion, the documents themselves should be protected
• in camera review needed so that a party cannot shield facts from disclosure by combining them with work product
• in camera review needed so that a party cannot shield facts from disclosure by combining them with work product
• “Of course, where the same document contains both facts and [privileged material], the adversary party is entitled to discovery of the facts.”
• under Rule 26(b)(3), documents that revealed legal theory of counsel were not discoverable, even though counsel had discussed them with counsel’s expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).